You can have both. There is one rule underneath it that surprises people, and it is worth ten minutes of anyone's time.
19 September 2026 · 3 minute read
"We got IRAP this year, so the tax credit sits on top of that, right?"
You can have both. Companies do it every year and they should. There is one rule underneath it that surprises people, and once you know it the rest makes sense.
Say a contribution covers some of the salaries on a project, and those salaries were going into your claim. The claim now gets calculated on what is left after the contribution comes off. On a $150,000 contribution, the federal credit comes down by roughly $52,500.
That is not a reason to turn the grant down. Around $97,500 of it still stays with you. The point is only that it is not $150,000 on top of a full claim.
Three things follow.
Then there is the part that makes money.
Most projects have some work that belongs in a tax credit and some that does not. Testing and development on one side, equipment and setup on the other. Where the facts allow it, putting the contribution against the part that was never going into the claim protects the credit on the part that was. That is ordinary planning, and it is only available while the budget is still being written.
Which is the whole reason to look at this before the budget is set rather than after.
If both are on the table this year, the interaction is worth half an hour before the budget is fixed. That is when the decisions are still available.
Book a meeting See what stacking adds up toGeneral information current at the date of writing, not advice on a specific claim, application or agreement. Program rules and administrative practice change; we confirm the current position for every file.
© Grantwork Inc. · poorva@grantwork.ca · grantwork.ca